Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Pro-abortion rights
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of language that unfairly favors one side over another.
Phrases like 'relentless campaign' and 'spread misinformation' suggest a negative view of anti-abortion groups.
Use neutral language to describe the actions of anti-abortion groups, such as 'campaign' instead of 'relentless campaign'.
Avoid assuming intent by stating facts, e.g., 'anti-abortion groups have expressed concerns about the safety of the drug.'
Providing more coverage or a more favorable portrayal of one side over another.
The article provides more detailed arguments and data supporting the pro-abortion rights side, while the anti-abortion side is mainly described in terms of their opposition.
Include more detailed explanations of the anti-abortion side's arguments and concerns.
Provide data or expert opinions that support the anti-abortion perspective, if available.
Using emotionally charged language to influence the reader's perception.
The article uses phrases like 'confusion, fear and misinformation' to evoke an emotional response.
Focus on presenting factual information without emotionally charged language.
Provide balanced perspectives from both sides to allow readers to form their own opinions.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.