Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Democrats
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Exaggerating or sensationalizing events to provoke public interest or excitement.
The article uses phrases like 'lawlessness on a scale none of us has seen in our lifetimes' and 'crime syndicate' to describe the current political situation, which can be seen as sensationalizing the issue.
Use more measured language to describe the political situation.
Provide specific examples and evidence to support claims of lawlessness.
Using language that unfairly favors one side over another.
The article refers to 'Trump and his thugs' and 'masked ICE fascists,' which are examples of biased language that portray one side negatively.
Use neutral language when referring to political figures and groups.
Avoid using derogatory terms to describe individuals or groups.
Using emotional appeals to persuade the audience rather than logical arguments.
The article appeals to the public's 'desire for retribution' and 'anger and frustration' to argue for action against Trump and his administration.
Focus on logical arguments and evidence to support claims.
Provide a balanced view of the situation, considering multiple perspectives.
Making claims without providing evidence to support them.
The article claims that 'the law doesn't apply to Trump and his allies' without providing specific evidence to support this assertion.
Provide evidence or examples to support claims about legal immunity.
Include counterarguments or alternative viewpoints to provide a balanced perspective.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.