Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Suspect
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Claims made without sufficient evidence or support.
The article mentions that no motive has been identified and that there is no evidence Sanford had ties to the Mormon church, yet it highlights his support for Trump without clear relevance to the incident.
Provide evidence or context for the relevance of Sanford's political affiliations to the incident.
Avoid making claims about personal affiliations unless they are directly relevant to the story.
Selecting specific data points that support a particular narrative while ignoring others.
The article focuses on Sanford's military background and political affiliations, potentially implying a connection to the attack without presenting a balanced view of other possible factors.
Include a broader range of information about the suspect's background and potential motives.
Avoid focusing on specific aspects that may not be directly relevant to the incident.
Use of language that may imply a bias or slant towards a particular perspective.
The repeated mention of Sanford's support for Trump could imply a bias, especially without clear evidence linking it to the attack.
Use neutral language and avoid implying connections without evidence.
Ensure that all relevant perspectives are presented in a balanced manner.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.