Workers Demand Justice for Immigrants as More Die in ICE Custody.

[ 25/09/2025 09:15 ] Read on prospect.org

Report Overview: The article presents a strong bias against ICE and the Trump administration, using emotionally charged language and unsubstantiated claims. It lacks balance by not providing ICE's perspective or response to the allegations. The article also uses sensationalism and appeal to emotion to engage readers.

Sides Objectivity Scores

Protesters and Advocacy Groups (70)

ICE and Trump Administration (50)

Sides Representation Balance

Favored Side

Protesters and Advocacy Groups

Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.

Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.

Detected Manipulations & Suggested Changes

Biased language

Use of emotionally charged language to sway readers' opinions.

Phrases like 'ICE’s violent and unlawful actions', 'inhumane and unsafe conditions', and 'immigration terror campaign' are used to evoke strong negative emotions against ICE.

Use neutral language to describe actions and conditions, such as 'alleged unlawful actions' or 'reported unsafe conditions'.

Sensationalism

Exaggerating or dramatizing events to attract attention.

The article refers to detention centers as 'inhumane gulags' and 'gulag archipelago', which are historically loaded terms that exaggerate the situation.

Avoid using hyperbolic terms and provide factual descriptions of the conditions.

Unsubstantiated claims

Claims made without sufficient evidence or support.

The article claims that conditions are 'so dungeon-like that they’re helping tuberculosis make a comeback' without providing evidence or sources.

Provide evidence or sources to support claims about health conditions in detention centers.

Omission of key information

Leaving out important information that could provide a more balanced view.

The article does not include ICE's response or perspective on the allegations made against them.

Include statements or responses from ICE to provide a more balanced view.

Appeal to emotion

Using emotional appeals to persuade readers rather than logical arguments.

The article uses emotional appeals by highlighting deaths and using terms like 'tragedy' and 'irreparable harm'.

Focus on presenting factual information and avoid relying on emotional appeals.

Spread the Truth

Share Report!

- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.