Laws For Vindictiveness.

[ 25/08/2025 02:30 ] Read on orissapost.com

Report Overview: The article contains several manipulations, including biased language, unbalanced reporting, and appeal to emotion. It heavily criticizes the proposed bills and the ruling party while presenting the opposition's perspective more favorably. The article lacks a balanced view and does not provide sufficient representation of the government's rationale behind the bills.

Sides Objectivity Scores

Government (30)

Opposition (60)

Sides Representation Balance

Favored Side

Opposition

Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.

Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.

Detected Manipulations & Suggested Changes

Biased language

Use of language that unfairly favors one side over another.

Phrases like 'misguide the gullible', 'merrily using UAPA', and 'political vendetta' suggest a negative bias against the government.

Use neutral language to describe the actions and intentions of both the government and the opposition.

Avoid using emotionally charged words that imply malice or incompetence.

Unbalanced reporting

Providing more coverage or a more favorable portrayal of one side over another.

The article extensively covers the opposition's criticism and concerns while providing limited explanation of the government's perspective.

Include more information on the government's justification for the bills.

Present arguments from both sides equally to provide a balanced view.

Appeal to emotion

Using emotional language to persuade readers rather than factual evidence.

Statements like 'turning the country into a police state' and 'political weapon' are designed to evoke fear and distrust.

Focus on presenting factual information and logical arguments rather than emotional appeals.

Provide evidence and data to support claims rather than relying on emotionally charged language.

Cherry-picking data

Selecting specific data points that support a particular viewpoint while ignoring others.

The article mentions the low conviction rate of the ED but does not provide a comprehensive view of all cases handled by the agency.

Include a broader range of data and statistics to provide a more comprehensive view of the situation.

Discuss both successful and unsuccessful cases to avoid selective reporting.

Spread the Truth

Share Report!

- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.