Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Trump Administration
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Exaggerating or sensationalizing information to attract attention.
The article uses phrases like 'major victory' and 'political win' to describe the Supreme Court decision, which may exaggerate the impact or significance of the event.
Use more neutral language to describe the Supreme Court decision, such as 'The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Trump administration's request to cut NIH grants.'
Using language that shows a preference or bias towards one side.
The article refers to the decision as a 'political win for Trump’s broader push' and uses terms like 'anti-DEI push,' which may imply a negative connotation towards the Trump administration's actions.
Use neutral language to describe the actions and decisions, such as 'The Supreme Court decision aligns with the Trump administration's policy objectives.'
Providing unequal coverage or emphasis to different sides of an issue.
The article provides more emphasis on the Trump administration's perspective and less on the detailed arguments of the opponents, such as the potential impact on scientific research.
Include more detailed information and quotes from opponents of the cuts to provide a balanced view of the issue.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.