Yes, SCOTUS should end gay marriage — but it’s WAY bigger than who stands at the altar.

[ 12/08/2025 21:30 ] Read on theblaze.com

Report Overview: The article heavily relies on biased language, appeal to authority, and unsubstantiated claims, which significantly affect its objectivity. The presentation of the argument against same-sex marriage is not balanced with opposing views, leading to a skewed representation.

Sides Objectivity Scores

Anti-same-sex marriage (40)

Pro-same-sex marriage (60)

Sides Representation Balance

Favored Side

Anti-same-sex marriage

Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.

Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.

Detected Manipulations & Suggested Changes

Biased language

Use of language that unfairly favors one side over another.

Phrases like 'leftist jurists' and 'judicial activists' are used to describe those who support same-sex marriage, implying a negative connotation.

Use neutral language to describe both sides, avoiding terms that carry a negative connotation.

Appeal to authority

Using an authority figure's opinion as evidence without presenting a balanced view.

The article heavily relies on Liz Wheeler's opinions and Justice Clarence Thomas' statements without presenting counterarguments from other legal experts.

Include opinions and analyses from a diverse range of legal experts to provide a balanced view.

Unsubstantiated claims

Claims made without sufficient evidence or support.

Statements like 'you're obviously wrong on that for multiple different reasons' are made without providing evidence or reasoning.

Provide evidence or logical reasoning to support claims made in the article.

Omission of key information

Leaving out important information that could provide a more balanced view.

The article does not discuss the potential social and legal implications of overturning Obergefell v. Hodges.

Include information on the potential impacts and perspectives from those who support same-sex marriage.

Spread the Truth

Share Report!

- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.