US to retaliate against IMO members that back net zero emissions plan.

[ 12/08/2025 21:34 ] Read on freemalaysiatoday.com

Report Overview: The article contains several instances of biased language, unbalanced reporting, and appeal to authority, which affect its overall objectivity. The US position is presented with strong language, while the opposing side's perspective is not equally detailed.

Sides Objectivity Scores

US (60)

IMO and Supporters (70)

Sides Representation Balance

Favored Side

Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.

Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.

Detected Manipulations & Suggested Changes

Biased language

Use of language that unfairly favors one side over another.

The statement from the US is described with strong language such as 'unequivocally rejects' and 'will not tolerate,' which portrays a confrontational stance.

Use neutral language to describe the US position, such as 'The US has expressed opposition to the proposal.'

Unbalanced reporting

Providing more coverage or detail to one side of an issue.

The article provides detailed information about the US's position and actions but lacks equivalent detail on the perspectives and reasoning of the IMO and its supporters.

Include more information about the reasons and motivations behind the IMO's proposal and the countries supporting it.

Appeal to authority

Using authority figures to support an argument without presenting evidence.

The article mentions the involvement of high-ranking US officials and President Trump without providing evidence or detailed reasoning for their stance.

Provide evidence or reasoning for the US officials' and President Trump's positions rather than relying solely on their authority.

Spread the Truth

Share Report!

- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.