Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
None
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Exaggerating or sensationalizing details to attract attention.
The headline 'Alleged Minnesota assassin Vance Boelter cries poverty during court appearance, claims he can’t afford lawyer despite owning home, 7 cars' is sensational and implies guilt before a trial.
Use a more neutral headline such as 'Vance Boelter Claims Financial Hardship in Court Despite Asset Ownership'.
Headlines that do not accurately reflect the content of the article.
The headline suggests a contradiction between Boelter's financial claims and his assets without providing full context.
Ensure the headline accurately reflects the content and context of the article.
Using language that unfairly favors or disfavors one side.
The use of words like 'cried poor' and 'whined' introduces bias against Boelter.
Use neutral language such as 'stated financial hardship' instead of 'cried poor' and 'expressed' instead of 'whined'.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.