Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Police
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
The use of sensational language to provoke public interest or excitement at the expense of accuracy.
The article describes the case as having 'sensational dimensions' and uses phrases like 'chilling timeline' and 'tragic deceit' to dramatize the events.
Use neutral language to describe the events without adding dramatic flair.
Focus on factual reporting of the events without using emotionally charged words.
Claims made without sufficient evidence to support them.
The article states that Sonam planned the murder with her paramour and contract killers, but this is presented as a fact without presenting evidence or acknowledging it as an allegation.
Clearly label allegations as such and provide evidence or sources when making claims.
Include statements from both the police and the defense to provide a balanced view.
Language that unfairly favors one side over another.
The article uses terms like 'premeditated conspiracy' and 'tragic deceit' which imply guilt before a legal verdict.
Use neutral terms that do not imply guilt or innocence.
Ensure that language used does not favor one side over the other.
Leaving out important details that could provide a fuller understanding of the situation.
The article does not provide detailed information about the defense's claims or evidence supporting Sonam's innocence.
Include more information about the defense's perspective and any evidence they present.
Provide a balanced view by detailing both sides of the story.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.