Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Trump's Tax Bill
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Using language that unfairly favors one side over another.
Phrases like 'One Big Beautiful Bill' and 'paradigm shift' suggest a positive bias towards Trump's tax bill.
Use neutral language to describe the bill, such as 'Trump's proposed tax bill' instead of 'One Big Beautiful Bill'.
Exaggerating or sensationalizing aspects of the story to attract attention.
The article describes the bill as a 'dramatic attempt to reverse the creeping Europeanization of the U.S.' and a 'thrust reversal in the turbine of the state'.
Provide a balanced view by discussing both potential benefits and drawbacks of the bill without using dramatic language.
Making claims without providing evidence or support.
Statements like 'every tax cut is a good tax cut' and 'Trump’s tax cut could ignite a boom' are presented without evidence.
Include data or expert opinions to support claims about the effects of the tax cuts.
Selecting only data that supports a particular viewpoint while ignoring data that contradicts it.
The article highlights potential benefits of the tax cuts but does not discuss potential negative impacts or criticisms.
Include a discussion of potential negative impacts or criticisms of the tax cuts to provide a more balanced view.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.