Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Donald Trump
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Exaggerating or sensationalizing information to attract attention.
The headline suggests that Donald Trump has a definitive key to end the Russia-Ukraine war, which is an oversimplification and exaggeration of the situation.
Use a more balanced headline that reflects the complexity of the situation.
Avoid suggesting that a single action can definitively end the war.
Headlines that do not accurately reflect the content of the article.
The headline implies a direct and certain solution to the Russia-Ukraine war, which is not substantiated in the article.
Ensure the headline accurately reflects the content and nuances of the article.
Avoid making definitive claims in the headline that are not supported by the article.
Claims made without sufficient evidence or support.
The article claims that lowering oil prices would end the Russia-Ukraine war immediately, without providing concrete evidence or analysis to support this claim.
Provide evidence or expert analysis to support claims about the impact of oil prices on the war.
Include counterarguments or alternative perspectives to provide a balanced view.
Selecting data that supports a particular argument while ignoring data that contradicts it.
The article focuses on potential benefits of lower oil prices without discussing potential negative consequences or challenges.
Include a discussion of potential risks or downsides of the proposed strategy.
Present a more balanced view by considering multiple perspectives and data points.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.