Led by Obama, Democrats’ schoolyard taunts mirror Trump’s trash-talk tactics.

[ 21/08/2024 21:57 ] Read on nypost.com

Report Overview: The article employs several manipulative techniques, including biased language, unbalanced reporting, appeal to emotion, and ad hominem attacks. These manipulations significantly reduce the objectivity of the article.

Sides Objectivity Scores

Sides Representation Balance

Favored Side

Republicans

Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.

Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.

Detected Manipulations & Suggested Changes

Biased language

Using language that unfairly favors one side over another.

Phrases like 'nasty abuse,' 'childish nicknames,' 'crazy conspiracy theories,' and 'whole lot of the pot calling the kettle black' are examples of biased language that portray Democrats negatively.

Replace biased terms with neutral language. For example, instead of 'nasty abuse,' use 'critical remarks.'

Unbalanced reporting

Giving more weight to one side of an argument or issue.

The article highlights negative actions and statements from Democrats while portraying Trump and Republicans in a more favorable light, such as mentioning Trump's compliment to Obama and downplaying his own history of insults.

Provide a balanced view by including both positive and negative actions and statements from both sides.

Appeal to emotion

Using emotional language to sway the audience.

The article uses emotionally charged language like 'schoolyard taunts,' 'vulgar hand gesture,' and 'childish press releases' to evoke a negative emotional response towards Democrats.

Use factual and neutral language to describe events and statements without appealing to the reader's emotions.

Ad hominem attacks

Attacking the person instead of addressing the argument.

The article includes personal attacks on Democrats, such as calling Obama 'childish' and Pritzker 'rich in only one thing — stupidity.'

Focus on the arguments and policies rather than personal characteristics or insults.

Cherry-picking data

Selecting only data that supports a particular viewpoint while ignoring data that contradicts it.

The article selectively highlights negative statements and actions from Democrats while ignoring similar behavior from Republicans.

Include a broader range of data and examples to provide a more comprehensive and balanced view.

Spread the Truth

Share Report!

- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.