Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Kamala Harris
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of language that reflects a preference for one side over another.
The article describes Trump as 'grappling for traction' and 'stewing over his personal grievances,' while Harris is portrayed as 'growing in confidence' and 'a more accomplished politician.' This language suggests a bias towards Harris.
Use neutral language to describe both candidates' situations.
Avoid emotionally charged descriptors that imply judgment.
Presenting one side's arguments or achievements more favorably than the other's.
The article emphasizes Harris's recent successes and the positive reception of her campaign while downplaying Trump's arguments and successes, such as his previous advantages in the race.
Provide equal coverage of both candidates' strengths and weaknesses.
Include more direct quotes from Trump that highlight his campaign's strategies and successes.
Exaggerating or dramatizing information to provoke a strong emotional response.
Statements like 'the most dangerous period of time I’ve ever seen for our country' and predictions of a Great Depression and World War III are sensational and may not reflect the current reality.
Present factual information without exaggeration.
Provide context for claims about danger or crisis to avoid sensationalism.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.