Kamala Harris: The ‘discount-Obama’ repeating Clinton’s failed 2016 playbook.

[ 03/08/2024 11:00 ] Read on nypost.com

Report Overview: The article employs several manipulative techniques, including biased language, unsubstantiated claims, and appeal to emotion. It also uses logical fallacies such as ad hominem attacks and false equivalence. These manipulations significantly reduce the objectivity of the article.

Sides Objectivity Scores

Sides Representation Balance

Favored Side

Donald Trump

Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.

Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.

Detected Manipulations & Suggested Changes

Biased language

Using language that unfairly portrays a person or situation in a negative light.

Phrases like 'discount Obama,' 'fire-sale Clinton,' and 'woke-babble' are examples of biased language that unfairly portray Kamala Harris in a negative light.

Replace 'discount Obama' with 'less experienced than Obama.'

Replace 'fire-sale Clinton' with 'less politically seasoned than Clinton.'

Replace 'woke-babble' with 'identity-focused rhetoric.'

Unsubstantiated claims

Making claims without providing evidence to support them.

The article claims that 'Cancel culture no longer merely shames, it’s driven some caught in its crosshairs to suicide' without providing any evidence or sources to back this claim.

Provide evidence or sources to support the claim about cancel culture leading to suicides.

Remove the claim if no evidence can be provided.

Appeal to emotion

Using emotional appeals rather than logical arguments to persuade the audience.

The article uses emotionally charged language like 'noxious dreck of grievance and entitlement' and 'woke culture thrives when reasonable people deny their best instincts.'

Replace emotionally charged language with neutral, fact-based statements.

Focus on logical arguments rather than emotional appeals.

Ad hominem attacks

Attacking the person rather than addressing the argument.

The article attacks Kamala Harris personally by saying 'She’s done nothing to earn these totems and deserves little reward for them.'

Focus on Harris's policies and political actions rather than personal attacks.

Remove statements that attack Harris personally.

False equivalence

Comparing two things as if they are equal when they are not.

The article compares Harris's use of identity-based supporter networks to hypothetical 'Whites-for-Trump' groups, which is a false equivalence.

Avoid making comparisons that are not logically equivalent.

Focus on the specific actions and policies of Harris without drawing false comparisons.

Spread the Truth

Share Report!

- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.