Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Donald Trump
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Using language that unfairly favors one side over another.
Phrases like 'cognitively challenged president,' 'undemocratic Dems,' and 'Trump haters' are examples of biased language.
Replace 'cognitively challenged president' with 'President Biden.'
Replace 'undemocratic Dems' with 'Democrats.'
Replace 'Trump haters' with 'critics of Trump.'
Making claims without providing evidence to support them.
Claims like 'Search engines at Google and Meta have been caught suppressing the facts and photos that don’t fit their politics' and 'the Biden campaign tapped its deep state contacts again to protect Joe' are unsubstantiated.
Provide credible sources or evidence to support these claims.
If evidence is not available, rephrase to indicate that these are opinions or allegations.
Using flawed reasoning to make an argument.
The article uses a straw man argument by misrepresenting the actions and motivations of Democrats to make them easier to attack.
Present the actual arguments and actions of Democrats without misrepresentation.
Avoid attributing extreme or unfounded motives to the opposing side.
Selecting only data that supports one side while ignoring data that supports the other side.
The article highlights actions by Democrats while ignoring similar actions by Republicans.
Include examples of similar actions by both sides to provide a balanced view.
Acknowledge the complexity of the issues rather than presenting a one-sided narrative.
Using emotional language to persuade readers rather than logical arguments.
Phrases like 'lunacy and hatred,' 'destroy the village to save it,' and 'jihad against him' are designed to provoke an emotional response.
Use neutral language that focuses on facts and logical arguments.
Avoid using emotionally charged words and phrases.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.