Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
None
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Claims made without sufficient evidence or sources.
The article frequently cites 'sources' without providing any verifiable evidence. For example, 'sources told The Post' and 'a source close to the Biden family claimed' are used without any concrete evidence.
Provide verifiable sources or evidence for the claims made.
Avoid using anonymous sources unless absolutely necessary and provide context for their anonymity.
Use of language that shows a bias towards or against a particular side.
Phrases like 'Joe’s big f–k you' and 'Joe truly knifing Obama and Pelosi in the back' are emotionally charged and show bias.
Use neutral language to describe actions and events.
Avoid emotionally charged phrases that can skew the reader's perception.
Quoting statements in a way that misrepresents the original meaning.
The article quotes Biden as saying, 'If I’m out, then I am endorsing her,' without providing the full context of the statement.
Provide the full context of quotes to ensure accurate representation.
Avoid cherry-picking quotes that can mislead the reader.
Leaving out important information that could provide a more balanced view.
The article does not provide any statements or responses from Obama, Harris, or their representatives, which could offer a more balanced perspective.
Include statements or responses from all parties involved to provide a balanced view.
Ensure that all relevant information is presented to the reader.
Selecting data that supports a particular viewpoint while ignoring data that contradicts it.
The article focuses on negative aspects of Biden's and Harris's actions while ignoring any positive contributions or achievements.
Present a balanced view by including both positive and negative aspects.
Avoid selectively presenting data that supports a particular viewpoint.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.