Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Former President Donald Trump
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Using shocking or sensational language to provoke public interest or excitement.
The headline 'FBI director questions whether Trump was struck by bullet: ‘Conspiracy bulls–t’' is sensational and uses strong language to grab attention.
Change the headline to a more neutral tone, such as 'FBI Director Discusses Details of Trump Rally Incident'.
Using language that shows a bias towards one side.
The article uses phrases like 'astonishing assertion' and 'conspiracy bulls–t' which show a clear bias against the FBI Director's statement.
Replace biased phrases with neutral language, such as 'The FBI Director's statement' and 'Trump's team disagreed with the statement'.
Giving more weight or attention to one side of the story.
The article gives more space and emphasis to Trump's perspective and his team's reactions, while providing less detail on the FBI Director's statements.
Provide more balanced coverage by including more details and context from the FBI Director's perspective.
Using emotional language to influence the audience's feelings.
The article uses emotionally charged language like 'mentally deficient' and 'willfully peddling falsehoods' to provoke a strong reaction.
Use more neutral language to describe the reactions and statements from both sides.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.