Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
None
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Using exaggerated or shocking language to provoke a strong emotional response.
Phrases like 'Selfish Joe Biden', 'land of the free, home of the craven', and 'Kamala the zero' are sensationalist.
Use neutral language to describe individuals and events.
Avoid using derogatory terms and exaggerated phrases.
Attacking the person rather than addressing the argument or issue.
The article repeatedly attacks Joe Biden and Kamala Harris personally, calling Biden 'selfish' and Harris 'useless'.
Focus on policy and actions rather than personal characteristics.
Provide evidence-based critiques rather than personal insults.
Making claims without providing evidence to support them.
Statements like 'She had no plan. No idea. No help. Useless.' and 'The man always knew how to hang on.' are unsubstantiated.
Provide evidence or sources to support claims.
Avoid making definitive statements without backing them up with facts.
Using language that shows a clear bias towards or against a person or group.
The article uses biased language throughout, such as 'deluded Democrats' and 'Biden the nothing'.
Use neutral and objective language.
Avoid using terms that show clear bias or prejudice.
Leaving out important information that could provide a more balanced view.
The article does not provide any positive aspects or achievements of Joe Biden or Kamala Harris.
Include a balanced view by presenting both positive and negative aspects.
Provide context and background information to give a fuller picture.
Using emotional appeals rather than logical arguments.
The article uses emotional language and scenarios to provoke a negative reaction towards Biden and Harris.
Use logical arguments and evidence-based reasoning.
Avoid relying on emotional appeals to make a point.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.