Kim Kardashian reacts to Ivanka Trump’s Taylor Swift-themed birthday cake.

[ 19/07/2024 16:38 ] Read on nypost.com

Report Overview: The article contains several instances of biased language, sensationalism, and unsubstantiated claims. It also includes some cherry-picking of data and omission of key information, particularly regarding the context of the feud between Kim Kardashian and Taylor Swift.

Sides Objectivity Scores

Sides Representation Balance

Favored Side

Kim Kardashian

Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.

Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.

Detected Manipulations & Suggested Changes

Biased language

Using language that unfairly favors one side over another.

The article describes the phone call as 'illegally recorded' and 'edited' by Kim Kardashian, which implies wrongdoing without providing concrete evidence.

The article should state the facts without implying guilt: 'The phone call between Swift and West was recorded and later released by Kardashian.'

Sensationalism

Exaggerating or sensationalizing details to attract attention.

The article uses phrases like 'fully manufactured frame job' and 'took me down psychologically to a place I’ve never been before,' which are dramatic and sensational.

Use more neutral language: 'Swift described the impact of the scandal as significant and challenging.'

Unsubstantiated claims

Making claims without providing evidence.

The article states that Swift's song 'thanK you aIMee' is speculated to be about Kardashian without providing concrete evidence.

Clarify that this is speculation: 'Some fans speculate that Swift's song 'thanK you aIMee' might be about Kardashian, although this has not been confirmed.'

Cherry-picking data

Selecting only data that supports one side while ignoring data that supports the other.

The article focuses heavily on Swift's perspective and the negative impact on her, while providing less context about Kardashian's side of the story.

Include more balanced information: 'While Swift has described the impact of the scandal, Kardashian has also faced significant public scrutiny and backlash.'

Omission of key information

Leaving out important information that is necessary for a full understanding of the issue.

The article does not mention any attempts by Kardashian to resolve the feud or her perspective on the leaked phone call.

Include Kardashian's perspective: 'Kardashian has stated in interviews that she believed the phone call was not edited and that she was trying to clarify the situation.'

Spread the Truth

Share Report!

- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.