Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Opponents
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of exciting or shocking stories at the expense of accuracy, to provoke public interest or excitement.
The description of Trump's rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, with 'blood streaming down his face from his injured ear after surviving an assassination attempt' is sensational and lacks substantiation.
Provide evidence for the assassination attempt or rephrase to avoid sensationalism.
A headline that is not supported by the text of the article or misrepresents the content.
The headline suggests a focus on Trump's journey to a third nomination, but the article includes unverified and sensational claims that may not be directly related to his political journey.
Adjust the headline to reflect the content more accurately, focusing on verified events.
Leaving out important facts that could change the reader's perception.
The article omits the outcomes of the legal cases mentioned, such as the acquittal in the Senate after the first impeachment, which is crucial for a balanced understanding.
Include the outcomes of legal proceedings and other relevant information to provide a complete picture.
Use of language that is not neutral and shows author's preference for or against a subject.
Terms like 'infamous mugshot', 'extraordinary political career', and 'seemingly invincible Trump' indicate a subjective tone rather than an objective report.
Use neutral language to describe events and individuals.
Claims that are presented without evidence or support.
The article presents the 'assassination attempt' and the 'infamous mugshot' without providing evidence or sources for these claims.
Provide sources or evidence for claims, or indicate if they are allegations.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The article uses emotionally charged language, such as 'blood streaming down his face', to evoke a reaction from the reader rather than presenting facts objectively.
Present facts without emotional language to maintain objectivity.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.