Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Rick Scott
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
The use of subjective language that implies a judgment or opinion.
Phrases like 'long game is poised to pay off' and 'holding the Trump Card' suggest a positive bias towards Rick Scott, while terms like 'doomed Herschel Walker campaign' and 'effete Dr. Mehmet Oz, an elitist in MAGA clothing' indicate a negative bias towards other subjects.
Use neutral language to describe political campaigns and candidates, such as 'Herschel Walker's campaign' instead of 'doomed Herschel Walker campaign'.
The use of exciting or shocking stories or language at the expense of accuracy, in order to provoke public interest or excitement.
The article uses sensational language such as 'spoiler alert: That didn’t happen' and 'epic defeat' which may exaggerate the events for dramatic effect.
Replace sensationalist phrases with factual descriptions, such as 'The expected outcome did not occur' instead of 'spoiler alert: That didn’t happen'.
Claims made without providing evidence or support.
Statements like 'Rick Scott is holding the Trump Card, and right now that’s a rising stock' are metaphorical and lack concrete evidence to support the implied success.
Provide evidence or context for metaphorical statements, or avoid using them when discussing political influence and success.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'A bullet couldn’t stop him. Can anything stop Donald Trump from becoming the next president and making America great again?' to evoke a strong response from the reader.
Focus on factual statements and avoid using language that is designed to evoke an emotional response.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.