Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Trump
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of shocking or exciting language at the expense of accuracy to provoke interest.
The article uses phrases like 'quasi-Nazi', 'overheated rhetoric', 'near-assassination', 'American Hitler', and 'existential' to describe the political climate and actions, which may exaggerate the situation for effect.
Use more neutral language to describe political events and figures.
Language that is partial or prejudiced, supporting or opposing a particular side or position.
The article uses biased language such as 'over-the-top attacks', 'unprecedented legal assault', and 'catastrophic debate performance', which suggests a lack of neutrality.
Employ neutral language that does not imply judgment.
Leaving out important facts that could change the reader's understanding of the situation.
The article does not provide context or examples of Trump's rhetoric or actions for balance, nor does it acknowledge any valid criticisms of Biden's policies or rhetoric.
Include information about the actions and rhetoric from both political figures for balance.
Presenting one side of a story more favorably than the other without a fair examination of both.
The article focuses heavily on criticizing Biden and his allies while not providing a balanced view of Trump's actions and rhetoric.
Present both sides of the political debate fairly and with equal scrutiny.
Claims made without evidence or support.
The article makes claims about Biden's and Obama's strategies without providing evidence to support the assertions.
Provide evidence or sources for claims made about political strategies and actions.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.