Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Donald Trump
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
The use of dramatic language to provoke interest at the expense of accuracy.
The article uses phrases like 'dangerous', 'highly inappropriate', and 'deadly serious' to describe Kyle Gass's comment, which amplifies the negative perception of his actions.
Use neutral language to describe the incident and the reactions to it.
Language that is partial or prejudiced towards one side.
Terms such as 'shameful', 'deplorable', and 'indefensible' are used to describe the public's reaction to Gass's comment, which may not represent the full spectrum of public opinion.
Present a balanced view of public opinion, including those who may understand it was a misguided joke.
Leaving out important details that could change the perception of the story.
The article does not provide information on the context in which Gass made the comment, such as whether it was part of a larger conversation or in response to a specific prompt.
Include the context in which the comment was made to provide a clearer picture of the incident.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The article emphasizes the emotional reactions of social media users and the politician's strong condemnation, which may sway readers' emotions rather than presenting a balanced argument.
Focus on factual reporting rather than highlighting emotional reactions.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.