Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
None
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of exciting or shocking stories at the expense of accuracy, to provoke public interest or excitement.
The title 'Joe Biden looks tired and exhausted — here are the tricks his team is using to obscure his blunders' is sensationalist, implying a deliberate and almost conspiratorial effort to hide the President's alleged incapabilities.
Use a neutral title that does not imply intent or judgment, such as 'Discussion on President Biden's Public Appearances and Health Speculations'.
Language that is slanted towards or against a particular outcome or party.
Phrases like 'Old age is clearly taking hold of President Biden' and 'the deterioration that comes with age' are biased, implying a negative perspective on the President's age and abilities without objective assessment.
Use neutral language to describe the President's public appearances and any concerns about his age, avoiding language that implies deterioration or incapability.
Claims made without evidence or support.
Statements from Garrett Ziegler such as 'That empty stare and the open mouth are signs that Joey has lost a step or two or five or six' are unsubstantiated personal opinions presented as facts.
Provide evidence for any claims made about the President's health or mental state, or clearly label opinions as such.
Attacking the character of a person rather than the arguments they present.
The article includes ad hominem attacks, such as the reference to Biden's 'empty stare and the open mouth' and the insinuation that his past 'lies and exaggerations' are catching up with him.
Focus on verifiable facts and actions rather than personal characteristics or unverified past behaviors.
Presenting one side of a story without a counterpoint or without giving equal time to opposing viewpoints.
The article presents a one-sided view of President Biden's capabilities, relying on negative anecdotes and opinions without providing any counterarguments or perspectives from supporters or neutral parties.
Include statements from a variety of sources, including those who support President Biden and those with neutral, expert opinions on the matters discussed.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The article uses emotionally charged language and anecdotes, such as the description of Biden's gait and the finger-nipping incident, to evoke a sense of concern or pity rather than providing an objective analysis.
Present information in a way that allows readers to form their own opinions based on facts, rather than guiding them towards an emotional response.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.