Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
None
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
The use of emotionally charged words and phrases that may influence the reader's perception.
Terms like 'bitter primary campaign', 'failed miserably', 'cheap shots', 'sad little man', and 'Worst President in the History of the United States' are examples of biased language that can sway the reader's opinion.
Use neutral language to describe the primary campaign and the outcomes.
Avoid using derogatory terms when referring to individuals.
The use of exciting or shocking stories or language at the expense of accuracy, in order to provoke public interest or excitement.
Phrases like 'failed primary challenge' and 'bitter primary campaign' are sensationalistic, emphasizing conflict and failure over a more neutral description of events.
Describe the primary challenge as 'unsuccessful' rather than 'failed'.
Refer to the campaign as 'competitive' instead of 'bitter'.
Claims made without providing evidence or sources to back them up.
Statements such as 'Trump lieutenants and RNC staff stupidly strong-armed the platform' and 'chicken fingers and pudding cups is what you will be remembered for you sad little man' are presented without evidence.
Provide evidence or context for the claim about strong-arming the platform.
Clarify the source or intent behind the 'chicken fingers and pudding cups' comment.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.