Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Democratic Challengers
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of sensational language to provoke interest at the expense of accuracy.
The article uses phrases like 'doomed Joe Biden', 'Joe must go', and 'unelected elite bureaucrats doing the thinking for this diminished president' which are sensational and designed to provoke a strong emotional response rather than provide an objective analysis.
Use neutral language to describe the political situation and avoid terms that imply a predetermined outcome.
The headline suggests a direct comparison between Joe Biden and Richard Nixon that the article does not substantiate.
The headline 'Who stumps for doomed Joe Biden? What Democrats can learn from Richard Nixon' suggests that Joe Biden's situation is analogous to Richard Nixon's, which is misleading as the article does not provide a thorough comparison.
Rephrase the headline to accurately reflect the content of the article without implying a direct comparison.
Use of language that is partial or prejudiced.
Terms like 'doomed Joe Biden', 'Lady Macbeth', 'after-school-special subject matter', and 'Tricky Dick' are loaded with negative connotations and bias the reader against the subjects.
Replace biased terms with neutral descriptors that do not carry implicit judgments.
Claims made without evidence or support.
The article makes claims about 'new defections from President Biden’s re-election effort' and 'unelected elite bureaucrats doing the thinking' without providing evidence for these assertions.
Provide evidence for claims made or clarify that they are the author's opinion.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The article uses emotionally charged language and comparisons, such as likening Jill Biden to 'Lady Macbeth', to elicit a negative emotional response towards the Bidens.
Focus on factual reporting and logical arguments rather than emotional appeals.
Selectively presenting data that confirms a particular position while ignoring a significant portion of related data or information that may contradict that position.
The article mentions Hunter Biden's transition from 'after-school-special subject matter to suddenly trusted and sage confidant' without acknowledging the full scope of his public and private life, which could provide a more balanced view.
Include a broader range of information about Hunter Biden to provide a more balanced perspective.
Arguing that because two things are alike in one or more respects, they are necessarily alike in some other respect.
The article draws a comparison between Joe Biden and Richard Nixon's political situations without adequately explaining how they are directly comparable, leading to a false analogy.
Clarify the differences between the two political situations or avoid making direct comparisons without sufficient evidence.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.