Top ex-Obama strategist David Axelrod twists knife on Biden: 'Not winning this race'.

[ 07/07/2024 20:32 ] Read on nypost.com

Report Overview: The article contains several manipulations such as sensationalism, biased language, omission of key information, and unsubstantiated claims, which significantly affect its objectivity. The presentation of Biden's side is particularly negative, with a focus on his age and debate performance, while not providing a balanced view or sufficient context.

Sides Objectivity Scores

Biden (40)

Axelrod (70)

Sides Representation Balance

Favored Side

Axelrod

Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.

Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.

Detected Manipulations & Suggested Changes

Sensationalism

Use of shocking or exciting language at the expense of accuracy, in order to provoke public interest or excitement.

The title 'Top ex-Obama strategist David Axelrod twists knife on Biden: 'Not winning this race'' uses sensational language that suggests conflict and drama.

Use a neutral title that reflects the content of the article without suggesting malice or conflict.

Biased language

Use of language that is not neutral and shows author's preference for or against someone or something.

Phrases like 'disastrous debate performance' and 'mumbled, couldn’t finish sentences and blankly stared into space' show a clear negative bias against Biden.

Use neutral descriptions of the debate performance and avoid language that implies a judgment of character.

Omission of key information

Leaving out information that is important to understanding the full context of the situation.

The article does not provide information on the specific criticisms or context for Axelrod's comments, nor does it mention any counterpoints or support for Biden.

Include information on the specific areas of criticism and add context or responses from Biden's supporters to provide balance.

Unsubstantiated claims

Claims that are made without evidence to support them.

The claim that Biden 'mumbled, couldn’t finish sentences and blankly stared into space' is presented without evidence or reference to specific instances.

Provide evidence or specific examples to support claims made about Biden's debate performance.

Spread the Truth

Share Report!

- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.