Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Donald Trump
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of exciting or shocking stories at the expense of accuracy, to provoke public interest or excitement.
The article uses sensational language such as 'Joe Biden is toast', 'Biden death blow', and 'Lady Macbeth' to provoke a reaction rather than provide an objective analysis.
Use neutral language and avoid dramatic phrases that are designed to provoke an emotional response.
Statements that are intended to deceive or mislead.
The article claims 'The Biden death blow came from The New York Times editorial board', which is a misleading statement without providing evidence of such a 'death blow'.
Provide evidence for claims made or clarify that they are the opinion of the author.
Use of language that is not neutral and shows author's prejudices.
Terms like 'Biden’s corruption', 'cognitive decline', and 'failed polices' are used without providing evidence, indicating a bias against Joe Biden.
Use neutral language and provide evidence when making negative claims.
Claims made without evidence to support them.
The article makes several claims without evidence, such as 'Biden and the left are doing more damage to democracy than Trump could do in 10 lifetimes'.
Provide sources and evidence for claims or present them as opinions rather than facts.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The article uses phrases like 'The shrieks and groans of horror' to evoke fear and manipulate emotions.
Present arguments based on facts and logic rather than attempting to evoke an emotional response.
Leaving out important facts or details that could change the perception of the story.
The article does not provide a balanced view of Joe Biden's policies or mention any positive aspects of his presidency, omitting key information that could provide a more balanced perspective.
Include information from multiple perspectives and mention both positive and negative aspects of the subject.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.