Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
None
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of exciting or shocking stories at the expense of accuracy, to provoke public interest or excitement.
The title and phrases like 'absolute worst butt-covering' and 'complete disaster' are sensationalized and designed to provoke a strong emotional response.
Use a neutral title and avoid emotionally charged language.
Headlines that do not accurately reflect the content of the article or exaggerate details to attract attention.
The headline suggests that Democrats are actively avoiding democracy, which is a misleading representation of the situation described in the article.
Rewrite the headline to accurately reflect the content of the article.
Language that is partial or prejudiced towards particular beliefs or outcomes.
Terms like 'scrambling', 'disaster', 'butt-covering', and 'gaslighting' indicate a strong negative bias against the subjects of the article.
Use neutral language to describe events and individuals.
Claims that are made without evidence to support them.
The article makes claims about the president's mental incapacity and the motivations of Democratic insiders without providing concrete evidence.
Provide evidence for claims or present them as opinions rather than facts.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The article uses emotionally charged language and scenarios to sway the reader's opinion, such as 'the elder abuse' and 'the influence-peddling biz dries up'.
Present information in a way that appeals to reason rather than emotion.
Selectively presenting only the data that confirms a particular position while ignoring data that contradicts it.
The article selectively presents negative opinions and incidents related to President Biden and Democrats without acknowledging any positive aspects or counterarguments.
Include a balanced view with data and opinions from both sides of the argument.
Implying that two things are essentially the same, when in fact they are not.
The article implies that the avoidance of democracy within the Democratic Party is equivalent to accusations made against Donald Trump, without providing a balanced comparison.
Avoid drawing parallels without a thorough and balanced comparison.
The tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms one's preexisting beliefs or hypotheses.
The article presents information in a way that seems to confirm the negative biases against President Biden and Democrats, without considering alternative perspectives.
Include information and perspectives that challenge the preexisting narrative.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.