Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
None
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of subjective language that implies a judgment.
Phrases like 'smart, strong, intelligent women of character', 'proven track record in leadership', 'idiotic politically correct nonsense', and 'mature beyond his years' show a positive or negative bias towards certain individuals without providing evidence.
Replace subjective descriptors with factual information about the individuals' qualifications and political experience.
Provide evidence or examples to support claims of character or leadership.
Use of exciting or shocking stories or language at the expense of accuracy, in order to provoke public interest or excitement.
Statements like 'Trump always has a few surprises up his sleeve' and 'Vivek had the courage to stand up to other candidates on the national stage' are designed to provoke excitement or admiration without providing substantive analysis.
Focus on the political implications and strategies behind Trump's potential VP picks rather than sensational language.
Claims made without evidence or support.
Claims such as 'Trump has always valued smart, strong, intelligent women of character' and 'He’s been on the national stage longer, has significant military experience and is already hated by the left' lack evidence and are presented as facts.
Provide evidence or specific examples to support claims about Trump's values or a candidate's experience and public perception.
Attempting to induce an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The letter mentioning Vivek Ramaswamy 'dropped out of Heaven' is an appeal to emotion rather than a rational argument for his suitability as a VP candidate.
Present rational arguments and qualifications for why an individual would be a suitable VP candidate.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.