Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Opposition to Biden's Candidacy
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of exciting or shocking stories at the expense of accuracy, to provoke public interest or excitement.
The title and content of the article use sensational language to provoke a strong emotional response.
Use a neutral title and avoid emotionally charged language.
Headlines that do not accurately reflect the content of the article.
The headline suggests a definitive conclusion about the president's fitness for office, which is not objectively supported by the content.
Ensure the headline accurately reflects the content of the article.
Language that is partial or prejudiced towards particular views.
Terms like 'senior moment', 'frozen', 'paralyzed like a statue', and 'Sleepy Joe' indicate a clear bias.
Use neutral language that does not carry a positive or negative connotation.
Claims made without evidence or support.
The article makes claims about Biden's fitness for office without providing concrete evidence.
Provide evidence or data to support claims made in the article.
Attempting to induce an emotional response instead of a rational argument.
The article uses emotionally charged language and scenarios to persuade the reader.
Focus on facts and rational arguments rather than emotional appeals.
Selecting evidence that supports one's argument while ignoring evidence that contradicts it.
The article references a single incident and a few opinions to generalize about Biden's fitness.
Include a range of evidence and incidents, both supporting and contradicting the argument.
Leaving out important facts or details that could change the perception of the story.
The article does not mention any counterarguments or the context of the incident.
Include relevant information and context to provide a complete picture.
Presenting one viewpoint without giving equal time to opposing viewpoints.
The article focuses almost exclusively on negative opinions about Biden's fitness for office.
Present opposing viewpoints and give them equal consideration in the article.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.