Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Right-leaning politics
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of exciting or shocking stories at the expense of accuracy, to provoke public interest or excitement.
The title and the overall tone of the article are sensational, focusing on the dramatic shift in political views of the subject.
Use a more neutral title and tone that focuses on the facts without sensationalizing the subject's political shift.
Use of language that is not neutral and shows author's preferences.
Phrases like 'woke idealism', 'sold a bill of goods', and 'asleep at the wheel' indicate a negative bias towards left-leaning politics.
Replace biased phrases with neutral language that fairly represents all sides.
Leaving out information that is important to understanding the full context.
The article does not provide sufficient context or counterpoints to the subject's claims, such as data on crime rates or the effectiveness of Trump's policies.
Include data and expert opinions that provide a balanced view of the political issues discussed.
Presenting one side of an argument more favorably than the other without a fair representation of opposing viewpoints.
The article heavily focuses on the subject's support for Trump and criticism of the left, without presenting opposing viewpoints or criticisms of the right.
Present a balanced view by including perspectives that support left-leaning politics and critique right-leaning politics.
Claims that are presented without evidence to support them.
Statements like 'violent crime and illicit drug use in America' and 'lawless chaos' are presented without evidence.
Provide evidence or data to support claims made in the article.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'heroin addicts to shoot up in public' and 'violent attacks on Asians in Chinatown' to provoke an emotional response.
Use neutral language and focus on presenting factual information without appealing to emotions.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.