Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Donald Trump
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of sensational language to provoke interest at the expense of accuracy.
The article uses phrases like 'Joe Biden's rough stretch', 'losing streak', and 'rock-bottom approval numbers' to sensationalize the situation.
Use neutral language to describe events without implying a crisis.
Use of language that is not neutral and shows author's bias.
Terms like 'troubled term', 'weirdly saluted', and 'losing focus' indicate a negative bias against Joe Biden.
Replace biased terms with neutral descriptions of events.
Claims made without evidence or support.
The article states 'G-7 insiders talked of him “losing focus” during discussions', without providing evidence or sources for these claims.
Provide evidence or credible sources for claims made.
Reporting that disproportionately covers one side of an issue.
The article focuses heavily on negative aspects of Joe Biden's performance and issues, with less attention to Donald Trump's potential weaknesses.
Provide a more balanced view by also discussing challenges and criticisms of Donald Trump.
Manipulating an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The article appeals to emotions with phrases like 'mix of fury and grief' and 'sympathy vote'.
Avoid language that is designed to elicit an emotional response instead of presenting facts.
A headline that gives a false impression of the article content.
The headline suggests a continuous negative trend for Joe Biden without providing a balanced outlook.
Craft a headline that accurately reflects the content of the article.
Choosing sources that support one's argument while ignoring those that do not.
The article cites polls and surveys that are unfavorable to Joe Biden without mentioning any that might show a different perspective.
Include a range of sources, including those that might offer a more favorable view of Joe Biden.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.