Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Trump Supporters
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of sensational language to provoke interest or excitement at the expense of accuracy.
The phrase 'King of super predators' for Joe Biden is sensational and designed to provoke a strong emotional response.
Use a neutral description of Joe Biden's policies or historical actions without provocative nicknames.
A headline that does not accurately reflect the content of the article.
The headline suggests that Trump receives strong support from black voters in Detroit, but the article does not provide substantial evidence or data to support this claim.
Provide data or evidence of Trump's support among black voters in Detroit, or rephrase the headline to reflect the content more accurately.
Taking quotes out of their original context to change their meaning.
The article quotes Trump and his supporters without providing the full context of their statements, which may alter the intended meaning.
Include more context around the quotes to ensure the original meaning is preserved.
Use of language that is partial or prejudiced.
Terms like 'immigrant-weary' and 'illegal aliens' carry a negative connotation and suggest a bias against immigrants.
Use neutral terms such as 'immigrants' or 'undocumented immigrants'.
Presenting one viewpoint without the counterarguments or perspectives.
The article predominantly features the perspectives of Trump and his supporters without presenting opposing viewpoints.
Include perspectives from critics or opponents to provide a balanced view.
Claims made without evidence or support.
Claims such as 'The black community is being hurt most by illegal aliens' are presented without evidence.
Provide evidence or data to support the claims made in the article.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
Statements like 'They’re coming for your jobs' are designed to evoke fear and emotional response rather than presenting a reasoned argument.
Present factual information and reasoned arguments instead of emotional appeals.
Reducing complex issues to simple terms or explanations.
The article simplifies the complex issue of immigration and its impact on jobs and communities.
Acknowledge the complexity of immigration issues and discuss them in a nuanced way.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.