Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Ukraine/West
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Using language that carries a positive or negative connotation beyond the facts.
Phrases like 'Putin's enemies are keeping up the pressure' and 'Putin's recent military gains in Ukraine appear to have been slowed' use emotionally charged language that portrays one side negatively.
Use neutral language such as 'opponents' instead of 'enemies', and 'The progress of Russian military operations has faced challenges'.
The use of exciting or shocking stories at the expense of accuracy, to provoke public interest or excitement.
The title 'Vladimir Putin has had another bad week' and statements like 'That has got to sting' are sensationalist and designed to provoke an emotional response.
Choose a more neutral title and avoid phrases that are designed to provoke an emotional response.
Claims made without providing evidence or support.
Statements such as 'Far right forces, no doubt helped by Russian online meddling' are presented without evidence.
Provide evidence for claims or present them as allegations rather than facts.
Presenting one viewpoint or side disproportionately to another.
The article focuses heavily on the negative aspects of Russia's actions and the positive aspects of Ukraine and the West's responses, without providing a balanced view.
Include perspectives that show different viewpoints and present the motivations and actions of all sides more equitably.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The article uses emotionally charged language and scenarios, such as 'Putin has been powerless to stop the West' and 'seduced by cheap Russian hydrocarbons or diplomatic bribes', to evoke a response from the reader.
Present information in a way that appeals to reason rather than emotion.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.