Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Hamas
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of shocking or exciting language at the expense of accuracy, to provoke interest or excitement.
The article uses sensational language such as 'deal with the devil', 'death cult', and 'bloodlust'.
Use neutral language to describe the situation and the parties involved.
Language that is slanted towards or against a particular perspective or party.
Terms like 'college antisemites', 'stooges', and 'psychopath' indicate a strong bias against certain groups and individuals.
Replace biased terms with neutral descriptors.
Claims made without providing evidence or support.
The article makes claims about the intentions and actions of Hamas without providing evidence, such as 'Genocide is Hamas’ sole purpose for being.'
Provide evidence or sources for claims made.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The article appeals to emotions with phrases like 'His death will make the world a better place' and 'endless bloodshed'.
Focus on factual reporting rather than emotional language.
Attacking the character of a person rather than addressing the substance of their argument or position.
The article refers to Yahya Sinwar as 'the Butcher of Khan Yunis' and 'the devil in Gaza', which are personal attacks rather than critiques of his actions or policies.
Discuss actions and policies without resorting to personal attacks.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.