Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
None
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of exciting or shocking stories at the expense of accuracy, to provoke public interest or excitement.
The title 'Joe Biden's senility freaks out DC just as much as it does everyone else' is sensational and implies a widespread panic that may not be accurately represented.
Use a neutral title that does not imply a mental condition or widespread panic.
Headlines that do not accurately reflect the content of the article or exaggerate details to attract attention.
The headline suggests a consensus on Joe Biden's mental state that is not substantiated in the article.
Rewrite the headline to reflect the content more accurately without making unverified claims.
Use of language that is not neutral and shows author's prejudice.
Terms like 'Geriatric Joe', 'stumbling, fumbling and bumbling', and 'gone gaga' are biased and derogatory.
Replace derogatory terms with neutral language that describes actions without implying judgment.
Claims made without evidence or based on hearsay.
The article states that 'the vast majority of Americans think — or rather know — he’s just not up to the job' without providing evidence for this claim.
Provide evidence for claims or acknowledge when a statement is an opinion.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The article uses phrases like 'You couldn’t be there and not feel uncomfortable' to evoke an emotional response rather than presenting objective facts.
Focus on factual reporting and avoid language designed to evoke an emotional response.
Errors in reasoning that undermine the logic of an argument.
The article implies that because Biden has made verbal mistakes, he is unfit for office, which is a hasty generalization.
Avoid jumping to conclusions without sufficient evidence.
Presenting one side of a story without a fair representation of opposing perspectives.
The article only presents negative aspects of Joe Biden's behavior without any counterpoints or context.
Include perspectives that support Biden or provide context for the incidents mentioned.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.