Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Donald Trump
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of exciting or shocking stories at the expense of accuracy, to provoke public interest or excitement.
The title and content of the article use sensational language to provoke a reaction, such as 'cynical power play', 'Mafia-like message', and 'invasion'.
Use neutral language and avoid charged terms.
Headlines that do not accurately reflect the content of the article or exaggerate details to attract attention.
The headline suggests a definitive motive and outcome ('keeping son Hunter out of prison, him in the White House') that is not substantiated in the article.
Ensure the headline accurately reflects the content of the article.
Use of language that is not neutral and shows author's preferences.
Phrases like 'travesty of justice', 'slimy blob', and 'scam' indicate a strong bias against the subjects discussed.
Use neutral language to describe events and individuals.
Errors in reasoning that undermine the logic of an argument.
The article implies causation from correlation, suggesting Biden's actions are solely for personal gain without providing evidence.
Provide evidence for claims or present them as opinions rather than facts.
Claims that are made without evidence to support them.
The article makes claims about Biden's motives and actions without providing evidence, such as the intent behind taking Hunter Biden on Air Force One.
Provide evidence or sources for claims made.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The article uses emotionally charged language and scenarios, such as the description of the border situation and the plight of police officers, to sway the reader.
Focus on factual reporting rather than emotional manipulation.
A logical fallacy in which two opposing arguments appear to be logically equivalent when in fact they are not.
The article equates Biden's actions with a 'Mafia-like message', suggesting a false equivalence between political actions and organized crime tactics.
Avoid comparing dissimilar situations or actions as if they are the same.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.