Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Iran
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of exciting or shocking stories at the expense of accuracy, to provoke public interest or excitement.
The article's title and content use sensational language such as 'love of Tehran' and 'IranGate fury' to provoke a strong emotional response.
Use a neutral title and avoid emotionally charged language.
Headlines that do not accurately reflect the content of the article.
The headline suggests a scandal on the level of 'IranGate' without providing substantial evidence to support such a claim.
Ensure the headline accurately reflects the content of the article.
Language that is partial or prejudiced towards particular views or outcomes.
Phrases like 'inexplicable support for Iran' and 'delusional Obama-era project' indicate a strong bias against President Biden's actions.
Use neutral language to describe events and policies.
Claims made without evidence to support them.
The article makes claims about Biden's motives and actions without providing evidence, such as 'doing everything he can protect, fund and kowtow to Tehran.'
Provide evidence for claims or present them as opinions rather than facts.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The article uses emotionally charged language to create a negative perception of Biden's policies, such as 'kowtow to Tehran' and 'appeasing the Iranian regime.'
Focus on factual reporting rather than emotional language.
The tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms one's preexisting beliefs or hypotheses.
The article selectively presents information that supports a negative view of Biden's policies towards Iran, ignoring any potential positive aspects or alternative explanations.
Present a balanced view that includes different perspectives and information.
Drawing an equivalence between two subjects based on flawed or false reasoning.
The article implies a false equivalence between the media's treatment of Trump's Russia allegations and Biden's Iran policies without acknowledging the differences in context and evidence.
Avoid comparing dissimilar situations without proper context.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.