Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Trump
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
The use of emotionally charged words and phrases that convey a subjective opinion rather than objective facts.
Terms like 'rigged', 'disgraceful trial', 'political prisoner', and 'can of worms' suggest a biased perspective without providing evidence.
Replace emotionally charged language with neutral terms and provide evidence for any claims made.
Claims made without providing evidence or sources to back them up.
Statements such as 'the case was rigged' and 'this is about hurting him in the election' are presented without supporting evidence.
Provide evidence or sources to back up claims, or present them as opinions rather than facts.
The article presents one side of the argument more favorably without providing a balanced view or counterarguments.
The article primarily features opinions from individuals who are critical of the prosecution, without presenting opposing viewpoints or the rationale behind the legal actions.
Include perspectives from both sides of the issue, such as legal experts who support the prosecution's actions or who can provide context for the legal process.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The article uses phrases like 'unprecedented conviction' and 'long-term damage to the justice system' to evoke fear and concern without providing a balanced assessment.
Focus on presenting factual information and logical arguments rather than appealing to readers' emotions.
The headline may not accurately reflect the content of the article or may exaggerate the claims made within the article.
The headline suggests a strong bias against the prosecution without indicating that the article is primarily opinion-based.
Ensure the headline accurately reflects the content of the article and does not exaggerate or mislead.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.