Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Donald Trump
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Using language that is partial or prejudiced towards one side.
The article uses phrases like 'bumbling Biden', 'crotchety, nasty, mean Biden', and 'piss-holes-in-the-ice' which are clearly biased and derogatory.
Use neutral language to describe individuals.
The use of exciting or shocking stories at the expense of accuracy, to provoke public interest or excitement.
The article sensationalizes the advice to Trump by using phrases like 'Just let bumbling Biden talk!' and 'Hamas thanks its useful idiot friends', which are designed to provoke a strong emotional response rather than provide an objective analysis.
Avoid sensationalist language and provide a balanced view.
Statements that are intended to deceive or mislead.
The article implies that Biden's smaller rally sizes are due to a lack of public interest ('It seemed more like the public wanted to socially distance from Biden than from one another'), which is a misleading statement as it ignores the context of the pandemic and social distancing guidelines.
Clarify the context of the pandemic and the reasons for smaller rally sizes.
Claims that are made without evidence to support them.
The article makes claims about Biden's mental state and debate performance ('Lead him onto something like the Himalayas') without providing evidence to support these claims.
Provide evidence or data to support claims made about individuals.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The article appeals to emotion by describing the alleged actions of Hamas and their impact on American students, aiming to provoke outrage and fear rather than presenting a balanced argument.
Present facts objectively without resorting to emotional manipulation.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.