Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Trump and Allies
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of sensational language to provoke interest at the expense of accuracy.
The article uses phrases like 'parade of contestants', 'starring', and 'famous catchphrase' to dramatize the political process.
Use neutral language to describe political events and processes.
The headline suggests a reality show format which is not literally occurring.
The title 'Newest version of Donald Trump's 'Apprentice' plays out at hush money trial with VP candidates lining up' suggests a literal show which is misleading.
Rephrase the headline to accurately reflect the political nature of the events described.
Use of language that implies a subjective opinion or bias.
Terms like 'Fat Alvin', 'crashed and burned', and 'sin' indicate a subjective tone and bias.
Remove subjective descriptors and present facts without bias.
Claims made without evidence or support.
Statements like 'Trump told reporters' and 'He’s believed to be looking for somebody' lack evidence or direct quotes.
Provide evidence or direct quotes for claims made.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The description of Bill Hagerty's background is designed to elicit an emotional response rather than focus on political qualifications.
Focus on the political qualifications and policies rather than personal stories.
Selectively presenting data that supports a particular position while ignoring data that contradicts it.
The article highlights positive aspects of certain candidates while omitting any negative information or criticism.
Include a balanced view of all candidates, including both positive and negative information.
Implying that two things are essentially the same, when in fact they are not.
Comparing the political process to a reality show suggests a false equivalence between entertainment and serious political events.
Avoid comparing political processes to entertainment formats.
The tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms one's preexisting beliefs or hypotheses.
The article seems to favorably present information that aligns with a pro-Trump narrative while dismissing or ignoring opposing views.
Present information and viewpoints that challenge the pro-Trump narrative to provide balance.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.