Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Trump
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of exciting or shocking stories at the expense of accuracy, to provoke public interest or excitement.
The title 'The 2024 race to the White House is now Donald Trump's to lose' is sensational, implying a foregone conclusion which is not supported by objective analysis.
Use a more neutral title that reflects the uncertainty of political races, such as 'Analyzing Donald Trump's Position in the 2024 Presidential Race'.
Headlines that do not accurately reflect the content of the article.
The headline suggests a certainty about Trump's position that the article does not objectively justify.
Align the headline with the content by presenting it as an analysis or opinion, rather than a statement of fact.
Use of language that is not neutral and shows author's preferences.
Phrases like 'flaky porn actress', 'ex-con serial liar', and 'partisan show trial' exhibit clear bias against the individuals and processes described.
Replace biased descriptors with neutral language, such as 'adult film actress' and 'individual with a criminal history'.
Leaving out information that is crucial to understanding the full context.
The article does not mention any potential weaknesses or challenges facing Trump, nor does it provide a balanced view of Biden's position.
Include information about challenges and criticisms of both candidates to provide a more balanced perspective.
Claims made without evidence to support them.
The article claims that 'media obsession about the partisan show trial of defendant Donald Trump is obscuring a far more significant truth about him' without providing evidence for this assertion.
Provide evidence or data to support claims, or present them as opinions rather than facts.
Using an authority as evidence in your argument when the authority is not really an authority on the facts relevant to the argument.
The article references the Brookings Institution and Fareed Zakaria as authorities without critically examining their analyses or considering other perspectives.
Include a range of authoritative sources and viewpoints to provide a more balanced analysis.
Selectively presenting data that confirms a particular position while ignoring a significant portion of related cases or data that may contradict that position.
The article selectively presents polls and statistics that favor Trump, without acknowledging any data that might present a more nuanced or less favorable picture.
Present a range of data from various sources to provide a more comprehensive view of the political landscape.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.