Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Trump
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
The use of emotionally charged words and phrases that indicate a bias.
Words like 'thundered' and phrases such as 'Far Left NYC prosecutor sent from Biden’s DOJ to arrest President Trump' and 'politically motivated prosecution' suggest a negative bias against the prosecution and imply wrongdoing without presenting evidence.
Use neutral language to describe actions and individuals, such as 'stated' instead of 'thundered', and avoid labeling individuals with politically charged terms without context.
The article presents one side of the story more favorably than the other, without giving equal coverage to both sides.
The article focuses heavily on the prosecutor's past affiliations and actions that could be perceived as biased against Trump, without providing a balanced view or responses from the prosecutor or the DNC.
Include statements or perspectives from the prosecutor or representatives from the DNC to provide balance.
Claims are made without providing evidence or sources to back them up.
The claim by Elise Stefanik that the prosecutor's involvement is 'ILLEGAL ELECTION INTERFERENCE' is presented without evidence to support the legality of the claim.
Provide evidence or legal analysis to support claims of illegality, or present them as opinions rather than facts.
The headline may lead readers to form a conclusion that is not supported by the article's content.
The headline suggests that the prosecutor's past political consultancy and donation are directly relevant to the 'hush money' case, which may not be the case.
Rephrase the headline to reflect the content of the article without implying a direct connection between past political activities and current legal proceedings.
The article uses language and claims that are designed to evoke an emotional response rather than present an objective analysis.
The use of phrases like 'Far Left NYC prosecutor' and 'politically motivated prosecution' are designed to evoke distrust and anger towards the prosecution.
Present information in a neutral tone and avoid language that is designed to evoke an emotional response.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.