Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Joe Biden/Jimmy Carter
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Using language that implies a negative connotation or judgment.
The article describes Trump's comments as 'belittling' and 'needling', which carries a negative connotation and suggests a lack of respect.
Use neutral language to describe Trump's comments, such as 'compares' or 'references'.
The use of exciting or shocking stories or language at the expense of accuracy, in order to provoke public interest or excitement.
The article's title suggests a focus on Trump's campaign strategy of invoking Jimmy Carter, which could be seen as sensationalizing the political rivalry.
Reframe the title to focus on the substance of the campaign issues rather than the sensational aspect of Trump's comments.
Claims made without evidence or support.
The article quotes Trump saying, 'Biden is the worst president in the history of our country,' without providing evidence to support or refute this claim.
Provide context or data to assess the claim's validity, or present it as an opinion rather than a fact.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The article evokes sympathy for Jimmy Carter by mentioning his age, recent widowhood, and hospice care, which may sway readers emotionally rather than focusing on the political arguments.
Maintain a focus on the political and historical context of Carter's presidency without emphasizing personal circumstances.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.