Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
US Support for Ukraine
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
The use of emotionally charged words and phrases that indicate a lack of neutrality.
Terms like 'statesmanship of Speaker Mike Johnson', 'Putin’s bad week', 'Kremlin’s week from hell', and 'naïve politicians' indicate a clear bias.
Use neutral language to describe political figures and events.
Avoid emotionally charged or evaluative terms when describing actions or policies.
Statements that may be technically true but are presented in a way that can mislead the reader.
The article implies that the delay in US aid is the primary reason for Russian gains without acknowledging other factors that may have contributed to the situation on the ground.
Provide a more nuanced explanation of the military situation, including other factors influencing the conflict.
Leaving out important details that are necessary to understand the full context.
The article does not mention any potential negative consequences of the US aid to Ukraine or the complexities of transferring frozen Russian assets.
Include information on the debate surrounding the aid and asset transfer, as well as potential risks or downsides.
Presenting one viewpoint or side of an issue more favorably than another without a fair representation of opposing perspectives.
The article heavily favors the US support for Ukraine and criticizes Russia's actions without providing a balanced view of the Russian perspective or the opinions of those who oppose the aid.
Present a balanced view by including the Russian perspective and the arguments of those who are critical of the US aid to Ukraine.
Using the opinion of an authority figure or institution to support a claim without presenting substantial evidence.
The article cites John Herbst, director of the Atlantic Council’s Eurasia Center, as an authority without critically examining his statements or providing alternative viewpoints.
Include perspectives from multiple experts and authorities to provide a more balanced view.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.