Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Critics of the Hate Speech Law
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of shocking or exciting language to provoke public interest or excitement at the expense of accuracy.
The use of terms like 'far-left', 'draconian', and 'anti-free speech' to describe the Scottish minister and the law.
Use neutral language to describe the law and individuals involved.
A headline that does not accurately reflect the content of the article or is exaggerated to attract readers.
The headline suggests that only 'right wing' critics oppose the law, despite the article mentioning opposition from figures not traditionally associated with the right wing.
Adjust the headline to reflect the diversity of opposition to the law.
Use of language that is not neutral and suggests a particular viewpoint.
Phrases like 'far-left minister', 'controversial Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Act', and 'out of their fucking mind' indicate a strong bias against the law and its supporters.
Employ neutral language that does not carry a positive or negative connotation.
Reporting that disproportionately covers one viewpoint or side of an issue.
The article heavily features the criticism of the law and its negative aspects, with minimal coverage of the reasons for its implementation or the views of its supporters.
Provide equal coverage and consideration to both sides of the issue.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.