Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Biden
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of sensational language to provoke interest at the expense of accuracy.
The phrase 'gobs of cash' and 'oodles of cash' are sensationalistic and informal, which may not be appropriate for a news article discussing campaign finances.
Use more neutral language such as 'significant amounts of campaign funds'.
Language that is partial or prejudiced towards one side.
The article uses phrases like 'fundraising juggernaut' and 'massive organizational advantage' to describe Biden's campaign, which implies a positive bias towards Biden.
Describe the campaign's fundraising efforts without using superlatives or charged language.
Reporting that disproportionately covers one side of an issue or one participant in an event.
The article focuses heavily on Biden's campaign strategies and successes, with less emphasis on Trump's campaign efforts or strategies.
Provide a more balanced view by including more information about Trump's campaign strategies and efforts.
Using an authority as evidence in your argument when the authority is not really an authority on the facts relevant to the argument.
The article quotes Robby Mook, Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign manager, as an authority to validate Biden's campaign strategies.
Include perspectives from experts with diverse viewpoints or from both political campaigns to avoid the appeal to authority bias.
Choosing sources that support one's argument while ignoring those that contradict it.
The article cites Biden campaign officials and Democratic strategists without providing equivalent insight from independent analysts or Trump campaign officials.
Incorporate sources from independent analysts or include more statements from Trump campaign officials for balance.
A headline that provides an incomplete or biased summary of the content.
The headline suggests a direct competition in campaign cash between Biden and Trump, but the article itself discusses broader campaign strategies and challenges.
Adjust the headline to reflect the broader content of the article, such as 'Biden's Campaign Strategy: Early Investments and Outreach Efforts'.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.