Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Critics
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of sensational language to provoke interest at the expense of accuracy.
The use of phrases like 'wild s**t in Scotland' and 'the mother of all April Fools’ jokes' adds a sensationalist tone to the article.
Use neutral language to describe the events and legislation.
Statements that are not false but could easily mislead or deceive.
The article implies that the law directly targets comedians and actors, which is a simplification of the actual scope of the law.
Clarify the scope and intent of the law to avoid misleading readers.
Leaving out information that is important to understanding the full context.
The article does not provide enough detail on the 'triple lock' to protect free speech, which is a significant aspect of the law.
Include information on the 'triple lock' and how it aims to protect free speech.
Presenting one side of an argument more favorably than the other without a justifiable reason.
The article gives more space and emphasis to the critics of the law, such as Joe Rogan, JK Rowling, and Elon Musk, without equally highlighting the views of proponents.
Provide equal space and consideration to the views of both critics and proponents of the law.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.